| Reference : Development and initial validation of a self-report measure to assess eating disorder... |
| Scientific journals : Article | |||
| Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Treatment & clinical psychology | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/55915 | |||
| Development and initial validation of a self-report measure to assess eating disorderspecific interoceptive perception | |
| English | |
Ortmann, Julie [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >] | |
Lutz, Annika [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >] | |
| Rose, Gitta [] | |
| Happ, Christian [] | |
Vögele, Claus [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >] | |
Schulz, André [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >] | |
| Zoé, van Dyck [] | |
| In press | |
| Psychological Assessment | |
| American Psychological Association | |
| Yes | |
| International | |
| 1040-3590 | |
| Washington | |
| United States - District of Columbia | |
| [en] Interoceptive deficits – particularly with respect to the perception of emotions, hunger, and
satiety – constitute important targets for intervention in eating disorders (EDs). Suitable self4 report measures to identify these deficits, however, are lacking. We, therefore, developed and validated a multidimensional questionnaire to assess eating disorder-specific interoceptive perception (EDIP) in terms of the ability to perceive and discriminate between emotions, hunger, and satiety. In two independent samples with a total of 2058 individuals (22.74% with self8 reported EDs), exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factor solution of the EDIP Questionnaire (EDIP-Q) with the subscales Emotions, Hunger, Satiety, and Discrimination. The EDIP-Q has sound psychometric properties and was related to convergent questionnaires but unrelated to divergent self-report measures, supporting its construct validity. Participants with self-reported EDs had significantly lower EDIP-Q scores compared to participants without self-reported ED diagnosis. While individuals with self-reported anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED) report similar difficulties in perceiving emotions, participants with BN and BED report greater difficulties in perceiving satiety and differentiating between hunger and emotional states compared to participants with AN. In contrast, individuals with AN report higher sensibility to satiety, but lower sensibility to hunger compared to individuals with BN and BED. The EDIP-Q is a valuable clinical tool to establish profiles of deficits in EDIP that provides the basis for developing more targeted treatment approaches for EDs. | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/55915 |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.