The Burden of Persuasion in Abstract Argumentation

Kampik, Timotheus; Gabbay, Dov M.; Sartor, Giovanni

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_13

Reference : The Burden of Persuasion in Abstract Argumentation


	Document type :	Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
	Discipline(s) :	Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/49965

Title :	The Burden of Persuasion in Abstract Argumentation
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	Kampik, Timotheus [> >]
	Gabbay, Dov M. [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)]
	Sartor, Giovanni [> >]
Publication date :	2021
Main document title :	Logic and Argumentation - 4th International Conference, CLAR 2021 Hangzhou, China, October 20-22, 2021, Proceedings
Author, co-author :	Baroni, Pietro
	Benzmüller, Christoph
	Wang, Yiqun
Publisher :	Springer
Collection and collection volume :	Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Pages :	224--243
Peer reviewed :	Yes
On invitation :	No
Audience :	International
Event name :	4th International Conference on Logic and Argumentation - CLAR 2021
Event date :	from 20-10-2021 to 22-10-2021
Event place (city) :	Hangzhou
Event country :	China
Abstract :	[en] In this paper, we provide a formal framework for modeling the burden of persuasion in legal reasoning. The framework is based on abstract argumentation, a frequently studied method of non-monotonic reasoning, and can be applied to different argumentation semantics; it supports burdens of persuasion with arbitrary many levels, and allows for the placement of a burden of persuasion on any subset of an argumentation framework’s arguments. Our framework can be considered an extension of related works that raise questions on how burdens of persuasion should be handled in some conflict scenarios that can be modeled with abstract argumentation. An open source software implementation of the introduced formal notions is available as an extension of an argumentation reasoning library.
Target :	Researchers
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/49965
DOI :	10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_13
Other URL :	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0\_13
Commentary :	13040

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Limited access	Burden of Persuasion in Abstract Argumentation.pdf		Publisher postprint	455.9 kB	Request a copy

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.

University of Luxembourg Library | Feedback | Legal notices