Reference : Distinguishing Syntactic Markers From Morphological Markers. A Cross-Linguistic Comparison
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Education & instruction
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/44774
Distinguishing Syntactic Markers From Morphological Markers. A Cross-Linguistic Comparison
English
Weth, Constanze mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM) >]
2020
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media S.A.
11
2082
Spelling Across Orthographies
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
1664-1078
Pully
Switzerland
[en] syntactic marker ; spelling ; reading ; spelling models ; morphological spelling ; English ; French ; Dutch ; German
[en] This brief review summarizes findings about syntactic markers, i.e., graphemic elements that indicate syntactic relations, such as inflection morphemes. Current spelling models subsume inflection with derivation and stem alternations under “morphological spellings.” They hence consider inflection only in relation to the orthographic word. This paper argues that syntactic markers are a specific category as they are part of the orthographic word but also systematically tied to the presence of syntactic features above the word level. Syntactic spelling refers thus not only to the correct spelling of a syntactic marker but to its correct application within a given syntactical context. In syntactic reading, (proof)readers must notice the marker and interpret it correctly to understand the sentence. Syntactic spelling and reading have hence been found to be highly demanding in many languages. Syntactic information is not decisive for sentence understanding in many cases, since the information can be deduced from the context. In order to focus the definition of syntactic markers, this paper restricts them to those graphemic elements that convey syntactical but no lexical features and are further unrelated to phonology. The paper concludes that syntactic markers and spelling should be distinguished from morphological spelling. Examples are given for English, French, Dutch, and German.
Researchers
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/44774
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02082
FnR ; FNR12675187 > Constanze Weth > GRASP > Effects of Grammatical Reflection on Spelling among multilingual pupils > 01/04/2019 > 31/03/2022 > 2018

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
fpsyg-11-02082.pdfPublisher postprint238.45 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.