| Reference : Evaluating Model Testing and Model Checking for Finding Requirements Violations in Si... |
| Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book | |||
| Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science | |||
| Computational Sciences | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/39794 | |||
| Evaluating Model Testing and Model Checking for Finding Requirements Violations in Simulink Models | |
| English | |
| Nejati, Shiva [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > >] | |
Gaaloul, Khouloud [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > >] | |
| Menghi, Claudio [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > >] | |
| Briand, Lionel [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > >] | |
| Foster, Stephen [QRA Corp Canada] | |
| Wolfe, David [QRA Corp Canada] | |
| 2019 | |
| Proceedings of the 27th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) | |
| Yes | |
| The 27th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) | |
| from 26-08-2019 to 30-08-2019 | |
| [en] Model Checking ; Simulink Models ; SMT Solver ; Searchbased Software Testing | |
| [en] Matlab/Simulink is a development and simulation language that is
widely used by the Cyber-Physical System (CPS) industry to model dynamical systems. There are two mainstream approaches to verify CPS Simulink models: model testing that attempts to identify failures in models by executing them for a number of sampled test inputs, and model checking that attempts to exhaustively check the correctness of models against some given formal properties. In this paper, we present an industrial Simulink model benchmark, provide a categorization of different model types in the benchmark, describe the recurring logical patterns in the model requirements, and discuss the results of applying model checking and model testing approaches to identify requirements violations in the benchmarked models. Based on the results, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of model testing and model checking. Our results further suggest that model checking and model testing are complementary and by combining them, we can significantly enhance the capabilities of each of these approaches individually. We conclude by providing guidelines as to how the two approaches can be best applied together. | |
| University of Luxembourg: High Performance Computing - ULHPC | |
| Tune | |
| Researchers | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/39794 | |
| 10.1145/3338906.3340444 | |
| H2020 ; 694277 - TUNE - Testing the Untestable: Model Testing of Complex Software-Intensive Systems | |
| FnR ; FNR12632261 > Mehrdad Sabetzadeh > EQUACS > Early QUality Assurance of Critical Systems > 01/01/2019 > 31/12/2021 > 2018 |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.