One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology

Nabbe, P.; Le Reste, J. Y.; Guillou-Landreat, M.; Beck-Robert, E.; Assenova, R.; Lazic, D.; Czachowski, S.; Stojanovi -\vSpehar, S.; Hasanagic, M.; Lingner, H.; Clavería, A.; Fernandez San Martin, M. I.; Sowinska, A.; Argyriadou, S.; Lygidakis, Charilaos; Le Floch, B.; Doerr, C.; Montier, T.; Van Marwijk, H.; Van Royen, P.

doi:10.1186/s13104-017-3111-x

Reference : One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND...


	Document type :	Scientific journals : Article
	Discipline(s) :	Human health sciences : General & internal medicine Human health sciences : Psychiatry Human health sciences : Multidisciplinary, general & others
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/34130

Title :	One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	Nabbe, P. [> >]
	Le Reste, J. Y. [> >]
	Guillou-Landreat, M. [> >]
	Beck-Robert, E. [> >]
	Assenova, R. [> >]
	Lazic, D. [> >]
	Czachowski, S. [> >]
	Stojanovi -\vSpehar, S. [> >]
	Hasanagic, M. [> >]
	Lingner, H. [> >]
	Clavería, A. [> >]
	Fernandez San Martin, M. I. [> >]
	Sowinska, A. [> >]
	Argyriadou, S. [> >]
	Lygidakis, Charilaos [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE)]
	Le Floch, B. [> >]
	Doerr, C. [> >]
	Montier, T. [> >]
	Van Marwijk, H. [> >]
	Van Royen, P. [> >]
Publication date :	2018
Journal title :	BMC Research Notes
Volume :	11
Issue/season :	1
Pages :	4
Peer reviewed :	Yes (verified by ORBi^lu)
Audience :	International
ISSN :	1756-0500
Abstract :	[en] From a systematic literature review (SLR), it became clear that a consensually validated tool was needed by European General Practitioner (GP) researchers in order to allow multi-centred collaborative research, in daily practice, throughout Europe. Which diagnostic tool for depression, validated against psychiatric examination according to the DSM, would GPs select as the best for use in clinical research, taking into account the combination of effectiveness, reliability and ergonomics? A RAND/UCLA, which combines the qualities of the Delphi process and of the nominal group, was used. GP researchers from different European countries were selected. The SLR extracted tools were validated against the DSM. The Youden index was used as an effectiveness criterion and Cronbach's alpha as a reliability criterion. Ergonomics data were extracted from the literature. Ergonomics were tested face-to-face.
Target :	Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/34130
DOI :	10.1186/s13104-017-3111-x
Other URL :	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3111-x

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Open access	Nabbe et al. - One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries a challenge! A RANDUCLA methodology.pdf		Publisher postprint	1.29 MB	View/Open

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.

University of Luxembourg Library | Feedback | Legal notices