Reference : Failure mechanisms and corresponding shape factors of shallow foundations
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
Engineering, computing & technology : Civil engineering
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/27634
Failure mechanisms and corresponding shape factors of shallow foundations
English
Van Baars, Stefan mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
Jun-2016
pp 551-558
Proceedings of 4th International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Atalar
Near East University Press
Yes
International
Lefkosa
North Cyprus
Fourth International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
June 2 to 4, 2016
turkisch society of soil mechnics and soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering and near-east university
Lefkosa
North Cyprus
[en] Footings ; Shallow Foundations ; Failure Mechanism ; Bearing capacity ; Shape factor
[en] In 1920 Prandtl published an analytical solution for the bearing capacity of a maximum strip load on a weightless infinite half-space. This solution was extended by Reissner in 1924 with a surrounding surcharge. In the 1940s, Keverling Buisman and Terzaghi extended the Prandtl-Reissner formula for the soil weight. Since then several people proposed equations for the soil-weight bearing capacity factor. In 1963 Meyerhof was the first to write the formula for the (vertical) bearing capacity of shallow foundations with both inclination factors and shape factors. The failure mechanisms belonging to the cohesion bearing capacity factor and the surcharge bearing capacity factor is for an infinite (2D) strip footing a Prandtl-wedge failure mechanism, but according to Finite Element Modelling (FEM) the failure mechanism belonging to the soil-weight bearing capacity factor is not. It looks more like a global failure mechanism. This means that the assumed superposition in the Terzaghi equation, and in the Meyerhof equation, is not automatically allowed. Additional FEM calculations show that in the case of a finite strip footing, and especially of round footings, the failure mechanism is again very different, and leads to much lower shape factors as factors based on a Prandtl-wedge failure mechanism. In fact the third direction, i.e. the tangential direction, which plays no important role in the failure mechanism for infinite strip footings, starts to play a major role in the failure mechanism and in the magnitude of the bearing capacity of the strip footing
Researchers ; Professionals
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/27634

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
Paper Cypres ZM2016 Failure mechanisms and shape factors - Update.pdfAuthor postprint830.26 kBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.