Browsing
     by title


0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

or enter first few letters:   
OK
See detailKann der Ausbau der institutionellen Tagesbetreuung das Vereinbarkeitsproblem lösen? Rückfragen an den familienpolitischen Konsens
Honig, Michael-Sebastian UL

in Lettke, Frank; Lange, Andreas (Eds.) Generationen und Familien. Analysen – Konzepte – gesellschaftliche Spannungsfelder (2007)

Detailed reference viewed: 76 (1 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailKann Erkenntnis kreativ sein? Die produktive Einbildungskraft in der Erkenntnistheorie und Ästhetik Kants
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Akten des XX. Deutschen Kongress für Philosophie (2005)

Detailed reference viewed: 74 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKann man Kultur digitalisieren?
Dembeck, Till UL

in Weimarer Beiträge (2010), (3), 421431

Detailed reference viewed: 75 (3 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailKann man sagen, was man meint? Untersuchungen zu Hegels „Sinnlicher Gewißheit“
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (2002), 84

Detailed reference viewed: 136 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKann man Wasser waschen? Kinder experimentieren mit Wasser
Sunnen, Patrick UL; Fautsch, Linda; Hoffmann, Isabelle et al

in www.Widerstreit-Sachunterricht.de (2008), 6(11),

Detailed reference viewed: 82 (8 UL)
Full Text
See detailKann man Wasser waschen? Kinderfragen und wo sie hinführen können
Sunnen, Patrick UL; Fautsch, Linda; Hoffmann, Isabelle et al

Article for general public (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (0 UL)
Full Text
See detailKannibalische Nachrichtentechnik : Bret Easton Ellis' »American Psycho« und Marcel Beyers »Das Menschenfleisch«
Kohns, Oliver UL

in Fulda, Daniel; Pape, Walter (Eds.) Das Andere Essen : Kannibalismus als Motiv und Metapher in der Literatur (2001)

Detailed reference viewed: 186 (3 UL)
See detailKannitverstan: Anmerkungen zum locus neerlandicus in der deutschen Literatur von Hebel bis Heine
Heimböckel, Dieter UL

in van Gemert, Guillaume; Geuenich, Dieter (Eds.) Gegenseitigkeiten. Deutsch-niederländische Wechselbeziehungen von der frühen Neuzeit bis zur Gegenwart (2003)

Detailed reference viewed: 75 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant and contemporary moral philosophy
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Kant Yearbook (2012)

Detailed reference viewed: 94 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant and contemporary theory of knowledge
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Kant Yearbook (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 165 (6 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant and Empiricism
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Kant Yearbook (2015)

Detailed reference viewed: 64 (1 UL)
Full Text
See detailKant and German Idealism
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

Book published by De Gruyter (2016)

Detailed reference viewed: 145 (4 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant and Neo-Kantianism
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Kant Yearbook (2020)

Detailed reference viewed: 72 (1 UL)
See detailKant and non-conceptual content
Heidemann, Dietmar UL; Heidemann, Dietmar UL

Book published by Routledge (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 158 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant and Nonconceptual Content – Preliminary Remarks
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in International Journal of Philosophical Studies (2011), 19

Detailed reference viewed: 68 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant and Rationalism
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Kant Yearbook (2014)

Detailed reference viewed: 126 (7 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant and the forms of realism
Heidemann, Dietmar UL

in Synthese (2019)

Realism takes many forms. The aim of this paper is to show that the “Critique of pure Reason” is the founding document of realism and that to the present-day Kant’s discussion of realism has shaped the ... [more ▼]

Realism takes many forms. The aim of this paper is to show that the “Critique of pure Reason” is the founding document of realism and that to the present-day Kant’s discussion of realism has shaped the theoretical landscape of the debates over realism. Kant not only invents the now common philosophical term ‘realism’. He also lays out the theoretical topography of the forms of realism that still frames our understanding of philosophical questions concerning reality. The paper explores this by analysis of Kant’s methodological procedure to distinguish between empirical (i.e. nonmetaphysical) and transcendental (metaphysical) realism. This methodological procedure is still of great help in contemporary philosophy, although it has its limits. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 116 (8 UL)
See detailKant et G.E. Moore sur l’intuitionnisme
Sosoe, Lukas UL

Presentation (2014, October)

Detailed reference viewed: 67 (1 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailKant et Hamann : Langage et critique de la raison
Sosoe, Lukas UL

in Piché, Claude (Ed.) Années 1781-1801. Kant Critique de la raison pure (2002)

Detailed reference viewed: 61 (0 UL)