Chronique Administration européenne Principes du droit administratif européen

in Revue Française d'Administration Publique (2016)

Judicial Implementation of EU Law

Presentation (2016, September)

The seminar analyses the obligation of the Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law (Article 19 TEU). The duty of the national ... [more ▼]

The seminar analyses the obligation of the Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law (Article 19 TEU). The duty of the national judge, stemming from fundamental EU law principles, to ensure effective implementation of EU law and effective judicial protection, is to be considered in the light of the right to an effective remedy enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which affects the balancing exercise with national procedural autonomy. The particular place and function of the preliminary reference procedure (Art 267 TFEU) in the legal order of the European Union may shed light on the impact of Article 19 TEU on the European mandate of the national judge. [less ▲]

Chronique Administration européenne Principes du droit administratif européen

in Revue Française d'Administration Publique (2016)

The State in the European Union; The Passion of a Great Actor

in European Politeia (2016)

La compétence de l'Union pour conclure des accords internationaux

in Revue du Droit Public et de la Science Politique en France et à l’Etranger (2016), 6

Le traitement du rapport des ordres juridiques en Grèce

in Baptiste, Bonnet (Ed.) Traité des rapports entre ordres juridiques (2016)

The place of EU law in the Greek Constitution allows the domestic judge to conciliate constitutional provisions and European Law obligations. Constitutional conflicts raised before and during the ... [more ▼]

The place of EU law in the Greek Constitution allows the domestic judge to conciliate constitutional provisions and European Law obligations. Constitutional conflicts raised before and during the financial crisis have been resolved in a context of judicial protection ensured by the national judge, who has at the same time a constitutional and a European mandate. [less ▲]

Chronique Administration européenne Principes du droit administratif européen

in Revue Française d'Administration Publique (2015)

Quelques réflexions sur la spécificité des engagements consentis au sein de l’Union européenne et leur impact sur le statut d’Etat membre

in Maison, Rafaëlle; Matringe, Jean (Eds.) Droit international et culture juridique Mélanges en l'honneur du Professeur Charles Leben (2015)

Le principe de loyauté, qualifié de principe le plus important du droit de l’Union européenne, peut être considéré comme le fondement des principes structurels régissant le rapport des ordres juridiques ... [more ▼]

Le principe de loyauté, qualifié de principe le plus important du droit de l’Union européenne, peut être considéré comme le fondement des principes structurels régissant le rapport des ordres juridiques. Mais la question est de savoir si les objectifs servis par le devoir de loyauté présentent une spécificité, qui donnerait un contenu propre à la notion d’appartenance. Les effets de l’appartenance diffèrent selon que les objectifs assignés à l’Union et servis par le devoir de loyauté ont une portée matérielle/substantielle ou institutionnelle/procédurale. [less ▲]

Le rôle du juge national dans le cadre du renvoi préjudiciel: une marge d’appréciation?

in Neframi, Eleftheria (Ed.) Renvoi préjudiciel et marge d'appréciation du juge national (2015)

The introduction to the collective book edited by the author analyses how the margin of appreciation of the national judge in the preliminary reference procedure depends on the double mandate to ensure ... [more ▼]

The introduction to the collective book edited by the author analyses how the margin of appreciation of the national judge in the preliminary reference procedure depends on the double mandate to ensure effective implementation of European Union law and to guarantee an effective judicial protection. The national judge has a limited margin of appreciation while evaluating the need for a preliminary ruling and the relevance of the questions addressed to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The limitations stem from the consideration of the preliminary reference procedure as a tool to ensure effective judicial protection. The margin of appreciation of the national judge is more important while implementing EU law following the preliminary ruling of the Court, as he is is ensuring the balance between the Union’s and Member States’ interests. [less ▲]

Within the Scope of European Union Law: Beyond the Principle of Conferral?

in Van Der Walt, Johan Willem Gous; Ellsworth, Jeffrey (Eds.) Constitutional sovereignty and social solidarity in Europe (2015)

Constraints on the exercise of the Member States reserved competence, and thus beyond the limits of the competence conferred upon the Union, are identified “within the scope of European Union law”. The ... [more ▼]

Constraints on the exercise of the Member States reserved competence, and thus beyond the limits of the competence conferred upon the Union, are identified “within the scope of European Union law”. The expression designates both the case of conflict between the exercise of retained Member States competence and specific obligations stemming from European Union law, and the case where the constraint consists in submitting Member States’ action to the field of application of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union. Is the strict interpretation of the limits of EU law the only way to address the principle of conferral as a guarantee for the Member States’ sovereignty? [less ▲]