Browse ORBilu by Open Access
- What it is and what it isn't
- Green Road / Gold Road?
- Ready to Publish. Now What?
- How can I support the OA movement?
- Where can I learn more?
ORBilu is a project developed by
Showing results 41 to 60 of 98
 "Bespoke" UK-EU Police and Judicial Cooperation Post-BrexitLigeti, Katalin  ; Robinson, Gavin in Criminology in Europe (2017), 16(2), 11-14 Detailed reference viewed: 235 (11 UL)Transversal Report on Judicial ProtectionLigeti, Katalin ; Robinson, Gavin in Luchtman, Michiel; Vervaele, John (Eds.) Investigatory powers and procedural safeguards: Improving OLAF’s legislative framework through a comparison with other EU law enforcement authorities (ECN/ESMA/ECB) (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 168 (15 UL) Challenges in the field of economic and financial crime in Europe and the USLigeti, Katalin ; Book published by Hart Publishing (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 478 (36 UL) Current Challenges in Economic and Financial Criminal Law in Europe and the USLigeti, Katalin ; in Ligeti, Katalin; Franssen, Vanessa (Eds.) Challenges in the Field of Economic and Financial Crime in Europe and the US (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 293 (13 UL)Asset Recovery in the EU:Towards a Comprehensive Enforcement Model beyond Confiscation? An IntroductionLigeti, Katalin ; in Ligeti, Katalin; Simonato, Michele (Eds.) Chasing Criminal Money. Challenges and Perspectives on Asset Recovery in the EU (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 375 (19 UL)Chasing criminal money in the EU: New tools and practices?Ligeti, Katalin ; Simonato, Michele Book published by Hart Publishing (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 417 (34 UL)EU Criminal Justice Actors: Accountability and Judicial Review vis a vis the EU CitizenLigeti, Katalin ; Marletta, Angelo in New Journal of European Criminal Law (2016), 7(2), 175 The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice represents both a constitutional objective and a solemn commitment of the Union towards its citizens. Being the AFSJ a domain of shared competence, many different ... [more ▼] The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice represents both a constitutional objective and a solemn commitment of the Union towards its citizens. Being the AFSJ a domain of shared competence, many different actors are entrusted and responsible for the fulfilment of this commitment. After the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, EU citizenship became a central reference point for allocating shared responsibility and regulating the multilevel and multifarious interactions between the different legislative and enforcement actors involved in the development of the EU’s most sensitive policy domain. Accordingly, this contribution will explore and provide a critical account on the potential of the “fundamental status” with regard to the democratic accountability of the legislative process under Title V TFEU, the parliamentary scrutiny over the AFSJ Agencies and the judicial protection of citizens’ rights against the acts of the AFSJ enforcement actors. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 285 (6 UL)Smart Enforcement Strategies to Counter Environmental Crime in the EULigeti, Katalin ; Marletta, Angelo in Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 178 (9 UL)The European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeLigeti, Katalin in Mitsilegas, Valsamis; Bergström, Maria; Konstadinides, Theodore (Eds.) Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 575 (41 UL)The European Public Prosecutor's Office:What Role for OLAF in the future?Ligeti, Katalin ; Marletta, Angelo in Durdevic, Zlata; Ivicevic Karas, Elizabeta (Eds.) European Criminal Procedure Law in Service of Protection of European Union Financial Interests: State of Play and Challeges (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 443 (18 UL)La quatrième directive anti-blanchiment : quels changements pour le Luxembourg ?Ligeti, Katalin ; Lassalle, Maxime in Revue luxembourgeoise de bancassurfinance (2016), (2), 52 Detailed reference viewed: 350 (28 UL)Criminal Liability of Heads of Business: A Necessary Pillar in the Enforcement of the Protection of the Financial Interests of the EULigeti, Katalin in eucrim (2015), (4), 145-150 Detailed reference viewed: 224 (4 UL) The cooperation of Internet and other service providers with judicial authorities: National report on LuxembourgFranssen, Vanessa ; Ligeti, Katalin Report (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 110 (8 UL)The European Public Prosecutor's Office: Certain Constitutional IssuesLigeti, Katalin ; in Erkelens, Leendert; Meij, Arjen; Pawlik, Marta (Eds.) The European Public Prosecutor's Office. An Extended Arm or a Two-Headed Dragon? (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 297 (12 UL)Le Côntrole Juridictionnel Dans Les Projets Du Parquet EuropéenLigeti, Katalin ; Franssen, Vanessa in Giudicelli-Delage, Geneviève; Manacorda, Stefano; Tricot, Juliette (Eds.) Le Côntrole Judiciarie du Parquet Européen. Necessité, Modèles, Enjeux. (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 222 (16 UL)Länderbericht Großherzogtum LuxemburgLigeti, Katalin ; Petschko, Martin in Ambos, Kai; König, Stefan; Rackow, Peter (Eds.) Rechtshilferecht in Strafsachen (2015) Detailed reference viewed: 191 (19 UL)Multidisciplinary investigations into offences against the financial interests of the EU: a quest for an integrated enforcement conceptLigeti, Katalin ; Simonato, Michele in Galli, Francesca; Weyembergh, Anne (Eds.) Do labels still matter? Blurring boundaries between administrative and criminal law. The influence of the EU (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 424 (24 UL)The European Public Prosecutor's Office: Toward a Truly European Prosecution Service?Ligeti, Katalin ; Simonato, Michele in New Journal of European Criminal Law (2013), 4(1-2), 7 Th is Article provides an overview of the possible institutional designs of the European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce [EPPO] with a view to the forthcoming proposal of the Commission. To this purpose, it ... [more ▼] Th is Article provides an overview of the possible institutional designs of the European Public Prosecutor’s Offi ce [EPPO] with a view to the forthcoming proposal of the Commission. To this purpose, it clarifi es meaning, scope and limits of Article 86 TFEU. Furthermore, it argues that in order for the EPPO to be able to act as a real European prosecution service and for complying with the objectives of an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, a set of powers uniformly formulated and valid in all Member States participating in the EPPO need to be elaborated [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 523 (28 UL)Approximation of Substantive Criminal Law and the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeLigeti, Katalin in Approximation of Substantive Criminal Law in the EU: The Way Forward (2013) Detailed reference viewed: 193 (8 UL)Model Rules for the Procedure of the EPPOLigeti, Katalin Report (2013) The European Model Rules for the Procedure of the future European Public Prosecutor’s Office are the outcome of a research project carried out at the University of Luxemburg in the period February 2010 – ... [more ▼] The European Model Rules for the Procedure of the future European Public Prosecutor’s Office are the outcome of a research project carried out at the University of Luxemburg in the period February 2010 – March 2012 with the financing of the Hercule II Programme of the EU Commission and the co-financing of the University of Luxemburg. The Model Rules were elaborated by a group of academics and practitioners working under the coordination of Professor Katalin Ligeti. The aim of the research project was to elaborate a set of rules with a model character delineating the investigative and prosecutorial powers of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), the applicable procedural safeguards and the evidential standards. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 687 (17 UL) |
||
