Komplexes Problemlösen und IntelligenzGreiff, Samuel ![]() Speeches/Talks (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 19 (1 UL) Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving; ; Greiff, Samuel et alin Psychological Science in the Public Interest (2018), 19 Detailed reference viewed: 6 (0 UL) Students' beliefs and attitudes toward mathematics across time: A longitudinal examination of the theory of planned behaviorNiepel, Christoph ; ; Greiff, Samuel et alin Learning and Individual Differences (2018), 63 Detailed reference viewed: 97 (2 UL) Students' exploration strategies in computer-simulated complex problem environments: A latent class approachGreiff, Samuel ; ; Martin, Romain et alin Computers & Education (2018), 126 Complex problem solving (CPS) is considered an important educational achievement indicator. Previous research has indicated that CPS performance depends to a substantial extent on the way students explore ... [more ▼] Complex problem solving (CPS) is considered an important educational achievement indicator. Previous research has indicated that CPS performance depends to a substantial extent on the way students explore problem environments. In this study, we investigated qualitative differences in the way students interact with such environments. In a sample of N = 2226 Hungarian students in Grades 6 to 8, we applied a latent class approach to investigate the use of the principle of isolated variation as an exploration strategy across six CPS tasks that were developed within the MicroDYN approach. Six qualitatively different class profiles emerged: proficient explorers, intermediate explorers, low-performing explorers, rapid learners, emerging explorers, and nonpersisting explorers. We further validated the profiles by comparing the latent classes with regard to students' overall CPS performance and additional indicators of task exploration. In analyzing age-related and gender differences on a cross-sectional level, we found only a small progression toward better performing class profiles from Grade 6 to Grade 8 (e.g., 14.6% of students in Grade 6 were proficient explorers vs. 24.6% in Grade 8; 27.1% of students in Grade 6 were low-performing explorers vs. 25.8% in Grade 8), and there were no substantial gender differences. This study contributes to the understanding of how students interact with complex problems and is the first to address whether variations in these behaviors indicate qualitatively different levels of strategic behavior. We discuss the theoretical underpinnings and potential of identifying class profiles of students' exploration behavior in the field of educational psychology. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 88 (7 UL) Would you prefer your coefficients with a little bias, or rather with a lot of variance?; Greiff, Samuel ![]() in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2018), 34 Detailed reference viewed: 6 (0 UL) EJPA Introduces Registered Reports as New Submission FormatGreiff, Samuel ; in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2018), 34(4), 217-219 Detailed reference viewed: 86 (4 UL) Collaborative problem solving education for the 21st century workforce; ; Greiff, Samuel ![]() in Nature Human Behaviour (2018), 2 Detailed reference viewed: 197 (31 UL)![]() Executive functions as moderators of the worked example effect on statistical reasoning. A replication study; ; Greiff, Samuel et alPoster (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 32 (0 UL) Complex problem solving and its position in the wider realm of the human intellectGreiff, Samuel ; in Journal of Intelligence (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 166 (8 UL) How employees perceive organizational learning: construct validation of the 25-item short form of the strategic learning assessment map (SF-SLAM); Niepel, Christoph ; et alin Journal of Knowledge Management (2018), 22 Detailed reference viewed: 71 (5 UL) Still comparing apples with oranges? Some thoughts on the principles and practices of measurement invariance testingGreiff, Samuel ; in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2018), 34 Detailed reference viewed: 25 (4 UL) The world beyond rating scales. Why we should think more carefully about the response format in questionnaires; Greiff, Samuel ![]() in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 47 (2 UL)![]() The role of metacognition in low vs high road transfer of complex problem solving skillsJohnson, Ashley ; Krieger, Florian ; Nicolay, Björn Fabrice et alPoster (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 94 (10 UL) Making use of data for assessments. Harnessing analytics and data science; Greiff, Samuel ; in Voogt, J.; Knezek, G.; Christensen, R. (Eds.) et al International handbook of IT in primary and secondary education (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 62 (2 UL) Understanding the link between need for cognition and complex problem solvingRudolph, Julia ; Greiff, Samuel ; et alin Contemporary Educational Psychology (2018), 55 With the aim of broadening the understanding of the nomological network of Complex Problem Solving (CPS), we investigated the link between CPS and Need for Cognition (NFC) while controlling for reasoning ... [more ▼] With the aim of broadening the understanding of the nomological network of Complex Problem Solving (CPS), we investigated the link between CPS and Need for Cognition (NFC) while controlling for reasoning ability. Further, we explored whether the relation between NFC and CPS was mediated by test-taking behavior (i.e., exploration time). Using structural equation modeling, we analyzed data from 474 German seventh graders. We found (a) that NFC and CPS were positively related, (b) that this link was partially mediated by CPS exploration time, and (c) that the link between NFC and CPS that was partially mediated by exploration time remained substantial even after we controlled for reasoning. Altogether, these results provide new insights into how CPS and NFC are linked. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 97 (7 UL) Diagnosing Tony Soprano, Norman Bates, Hercule Poirot, and Carol Beer through the DSM-5 AMPD; ; Greiff, Samuel ![]() in European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2018), 34 Detailed reference viewed: 6 (0 UL) Computer-based assessments in PISA. Challenges and potentials for research and policyGreiff, Samuel ; Speeches/Talks (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 11 (2 UL) Neues zu Prozessindikatoren. Von der Erklärung des Aufgabenerfolgs zum formative Assessment; ; et al Speeches/Talks (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 16 (0 UL) Komplexes Problemlösen im Kontext internationaler Large-Scale AssessmentsGreiff, Samuel ![]() Speeches/Talks (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 11 (1 UL) And finally some empirical data: Validating the assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in PISA.Greiff, Samuel ![]() Presentation (2017, October) Detailed reference viewed: 24 (0 UL) |
||