![]() Report on FranceCuniberti, Gilles ; in Ferrari, Franco (Ed.) Iura Novit Curia in International Arbitration (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 76 (1 UL) Étude 725 Immunités d'exécutionCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Brenner, Claude (Ed.) Le Lamy Droit de l'exécution forcée (2018) Detailed reference viewed: 47 (0 UL) Droit européen de l'insolvabilitéCuniberti, Gilles ; Book published by LGDJ (2017) Les procédures d’insolvabilité présentent de plus en plus fréquemment une dimension européenne qui fait naître nombre de questions particulières. Quelles sont les juridictions compétentes pour ouvrir une ... [more ▼] Les procédures d’insolvabilité présentent de plus en plus fréquemment une dimension européenne qui fait naître nombre de questions particulières. Quelles sont les juridictions compétentes pour ouvrir une procédure d’insolvabilité et quelle loi doivent-elles appliquer ? Comment assurer l’égalité entre les créanciers dans quelque État membre qu’ils se trouvent ? Comment protéger ceux qui sont titulaires de sûretés réelles portant sur des biens situés à l’étranger ? Comment prendre en compte l’appartenance du débiteur à un groupe de sociétés? Depuis le 26 juin 2017, ces questions sont régies par le Règlement n° 2015/848 du 20 mai 2015, qui modifie nombre des solutions en vigueur sous l’empire de l’ancien Règlement n° 1346/2000 du 29 mai 2000. Cet ouvrage s’adresse à tous les praticiens et universitaires intéressés par le droit européen de l’insolvabilité. En plus d’exposer les solutions issues du Règlement ou de la jurisprudence européenne, il met en exergue, le cas échéant, l’interprétation de ces solutions par la jurisprudence et la doctrine de différents États membres. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 186 (2 UL) Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Approach - Text and CasesCuniberti, Gilles ![]() Book published by Edward Elgar Publishing (2017) The Conflict of Laws, also known as private international law, is a field of the greatest importance in an increasingly globalized world. The analysis of any legal issue, in a case involving more than one ... [more ▼] The Conflict of Laws, also known as private international law, is a field of the greatest importance in an increasingly globalized world. The analysis of any legal issue, in a case involving more than one country, must start with an assessment of which court could potentially hear the case and which law it would apply. Contrary to other manuals or casebooks, which focus on the law of one jurisdiction, this innovative casebook offers a comparative treatment of the field. On each issue, materials from several jurisdictions are discussed and compared. The approach centers on comprehending the common principles of the field, but also highlights the fundamental differences. The goal is to train lawyers who not only will know the law of their own jurisdiction, but also will have an understanding of the key differences existing between the main models, and will thus be able to interact usefully with clients from other jurisdictions. This casebook systematically presents and compares the laws of four jurisdictions: the United States, the European Union, France and England (where left untouched by EU harmonization). It offers additional insight into rules applicable in China and Japan and also discusses remarkable solutions adopted in a wide range of jurisdictions such as Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Canada and Tunisia. All materials from non-English speaking jurisdictions have been translated into English. Key features of the casebook: • written by a leading authority in the field • carefully selected extracts from primary and secondary sources build a clear picture of the field • expert analytical commentary and questions set the extracts in context • US, EU, French and English perspectives integrated throughout the text to ensure maximum relevance and encourage students to make comparative assessments • numerous references to Chinese and Japanese solutions • leads students through the field from beginning to end • perfectly pitched for international students and courses with a global outlook. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 822 (49 UL) Le matériel ferroviaire roulant affecté au service public dans le Protocole de Luxembourg du 23 février 2007Cuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Riassetto, Isabelle (Ed.) Mélanges Rusen Ergec (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 89 (1 UL) Rethinking International Commercial Arbitration : Towards Default ArbitrationCuniberti, Gilles ![]() Book published by Edward Elgar (2017) Arbitration is the normal and preferred mode for resolving international commercial disputes. It presents an essential advantage over national courts by offering neutrality of adjudication, but is ... [more ▼] Arbitration is the normal and preferred mode for resolving international commercial disputes. It presents an essential advantage over national courts by offering neutrality of adjudication, but is currently only available where both parties have consented to it. This innovative book proposes a fundamental rethink of this assumption and argues that arbitration should become the default mode of resolution in international commercial disputes. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 187 (0 UL) The Promotion of Best Practices in European Civil Procedure: Some Introductory RemarksCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in kramer, xandra (Ed.) From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 139 (0 UL) La clause attributive de juridictionCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Thieltgen, Nicolas (Ed.) Le Banquier Luxembourgeois et le droit international privé (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 135 (1 UL) Brexit et contentieux international des affairesCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Ho Dac, Marion (Ed.) Le Brexit (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 201 (0 UL) An evaluation study of national procedural laws and practices in terms of their impact on the free circulation of judgments and on the equivalence and effectiveness of the procedural protection of consumers under EU consumer lawCuniberti, Gilles ; ; et alReport (2017) In response to the tender specifications the study consists of two parts. The first examines whether divergences in national procedural laws and practices constitute obstacles to mutual trust and, in the ... [more ▼] In response to the tender specifications the study consists of two parts. The first examines whether divergences in national procedural laws and practices constitute obstacles to mutual trust and, in the affirmative, identifies the locus and the scale of such obstacles; it thereby facilitates the identification of the areas in which mutual trust needs to be further enhanced in line with the European Council Conclusions of 26/27 June 2014. In addition, the study addresses possible obstacles to legal certainty when businesses and citizens engage in cross-border litigation. The second strand of the study evaluates whether and to what extent national procedural laws and practices ensure the effective procedural protection of EU consumers. Both strands of the study investigate the legal and the practical situations in the civil procedural laws of the 28 EU Member States. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 183 (1 UL) Injonctions provisoires et droit européen de l’insolvabilitéCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 105 (0 UL) Litispendance et mesures provisoires: note sous CJUE, 4 mai 2017, HanseyachtsCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Revue Critique de Droit International Privé (2017) Detailed reference viewed: 91 (0 UL) The Laws of Asian International Business TransactionsCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Washington International Law Journal (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 191 (4 UL) FranceCuniberti, Gilles ; in Richter, Thomas (Ed.) Categories and Ranking of Claims (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 107 (1 UL) Arbitration (UNCITRAL Model Law)Cuniberti, Gilles ![]() in European Encyclopedia of Private International Law (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 169 (2 UL) L’expérience américaine de l’enseignement transétatique du droitCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Ancel, Pascal; Heuschling, Luc (Eds.) La transnationalisation de l’enseignement du droit (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 105 (1 UL) Recevabilité du recours contre une ordonnance d'exequatur d’un tiers à une injonction in personamCuniberti, Gilles ; in Pasicrisie Luxembourgeoise: Recueil Trimestriel de la Jurisprudence Luxembourgeoise (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 77 (0 UL) Étude 730 Mise en œuvre des procédures civiles d'exécutionCuniberti, Gilles ![]() in Brenner, Claude (Ed.) Le Lamy Droit de l'exécution forcée (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 55 (0 UL) Brussels Ibis Regulation, Commentary of Article 46Cuniberti, Gilles ; in Magnus, Ullrich; Mankowski, Peter (Eds.) Brussels Ibis Regulation (2016) The Brussels Ibis Regulation is to become by far the most prominent cornerstone of the European law of international civil procedure. Its imminence can be easily ascertained by every practitioner even ... [more ▼] The Brussels Ibis Regulation is to become by far the most prominent cornerstone of the European law of international civil procedure. Its imminence can be easily ascertained by every practitioner even remotely concerned with cross-border work in Europe. However arcane private international law in general might appear to practitioners – the Brussels I Regulation was a well-known and renowned instrument and the Brussels Ibis Regulation will become so as its proper heir. The so called Brussels system has proven its immeasurable and incomparable value for over forty years. The European Court of Justice and the national courts of the Member States have produced an abundance and a treasure of judgments interpreting the Brussels Convention and the Brussels I Regulation. The effort of completing a truly pan-European commentary mirrors the pan-European nature of its fascinating object. This commentary – which of course covers the jurisprudence of the ECJ in a comprehensive manner – assembles a team of very prominent and renowned authors from total Europe. The authors’ geographical provenience stretches from Denmark in the North to Italy in the South and from Portugal and the United Kingdom in the West to Austria in the East. Now the time is ripe to start such an enterprise. This commentary is the first full scale article-by-article commentary in English to address the Brussels Ibis Regulation. It is truly European in nature and style. It provides thorough and succinct in-depth analysis of every single Article and offers most valuable guidance for lawyers, judges and academics throughout Europe. It is an indispensable working tool for all practitioners involved in this field of law. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 133 (0 UL) Brussels Ibis Regulation, Commentary of Article 47Cuniberti, Gilles ; in Mankowski, Peter; Magnus, Ulrich (Eds.) Brussels Ibis Regulation (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 96 (0 UL) |
||