Empathy, self-esteem, distress, and dramaAleksic, Gabrijela ![]() in Journal for Drama in Education (2008), 24(1), 6-14 Detailed reference viewed: 103 (3 UL) Are there cross-cultural differences in empathy, self-esteem and distress disclosure?Aleksic, Gabrijela ![]() Bachelor/master dissertation (2007) The purpose of this research was to find possible cross-cultural differences in empathy, self-esteem and distress disclosure involving 418 adolescents (217 females, 201 males) from four schools in the U.K ... [more ▼] The purpose of this research was to find possible cross-cultural differences in empathy, self-esteem and distress disclosure involving 418 adolescents (217 females, 201 males) from four schools in the U.K., U.S.A., Serbia, and Luxembourg. Moreover, we wanted to know are there gender differences and is there an association between academic achievement and empathy, self-esteem, and distress disclosure. We used three scales: A Measure of Emotional Empathy for Adults and Adolescents (MEEAA) (Caruso & Mayer, 1998), The Distress Disclosure Index (DDI) (Kahn & Hessling, 2001), and Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) (Rosenberg, 1965). The scales appeared to be reliable (alphas ranging from .87 for the MEEAA, .86 for the RSE, and to .93 for DDI). The factor analysis showed that the RSE is bidimensional depicting Self-Worth and Self-Deprecation, the DDI is unidimensional as it supposed to be, and we chose three-dimensional solution for MEEAA depicting Empathic Suffering, Responsive Crying, and Positive Sharing. The MANOVA results showed that hypothesis on country differences in empathy, self-esteem, and distress disclosure is confirmed. There are significant country differences especially concerning the U.K. participants that reported the lowest tendency for empathy, self-esteem, and distress disclosure. Hypothesis that Serbian participants are the highest in reporting empathy was not confirmed. Moreover, hypothesis that American participants are the highest in reporting self-esteem was not confirmed either. Finally, hypothesis that the U.K. participants are the lowest in reporting distress disclosure was confirmed. Furthermore, hypotheses on gender differences were confirmed: females reported more of a tendency for empathy than males, males reported more of a tendency for self-esteem than females, and females reported more of a tendency to disclose distress than males. No association between academic achievement and empathy, self-esteem, and distress disclosure was found. Considering associations between empathy, self-esteem, and distress disclosure the results showed that there is a medium to strong association between empathy and distress disclosure in all countries, and a positive association between distress disclosure and self-esteem. Moreover, the results showed that there is a significant negative association between self-esteem and empathy, especially in the U.K. and Luxembourg. As well, cluster analysis grouped participants who are high in self-esteem, but low in empathy, and distress disclosure, in one group. We speculated that this general self-esteem might be “false” self-esteem or narcissism since narcissism is negatively correlated to empathy. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 211 (5 UL) "Yes, I'm willing": Experiencing Culture in Intimate Intercultural RelationshipsAleksic, Gabrijela ![]() Book published by Information Age Publications (n.d.) I introduce the book starting by my own personal experience of growing up in a mixed family and being myself in a mixed marriage. I describe the structure of the book by building up my own method: how I ... [more ▼] I introduce the book starting by my own personal experience of growing up in a mixed family and being myself in a mixed marriage. I describe the structure of the book by building up my own method: how I chose this topic, who were the people I interviewed, how (interviews, stories, and objects) and why was the single-but-critical instances analysis important. I focus on the richness of the interaction I had with the interviewees. I underlie the phenomenological stories of struggles, trust and vulnerability. The chapters resolve around power relations, expressing affection, in-depth communication, child rearing, conflict resolution strategies, empathy, female identity, future planning, the role of humor, the biggest cultural and linguistic challenges and opportunities. The focus is on the phenomenon captured in single-but-critical instances in participants' stories. I conclude by describing what significance culture has in intimate intercultural relationships. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 357 (18 UL) |
||